Will Saquon Barkley and Josh Jacobs play in week 1?

In the upcoming season, two prominent players, Josh Jacobs and Saquon Barkley, are facing a tough decision - to sit out or play. This blog post will delve into their situations, analyze their potential choices, and examine the implications for both players and their teams. While both options have their pros and cons, it's essential to assess the players' perspectives and the possible outcomes.

Jacobs seems inclined to sit out and make a statement, regardless of whether it's the right decision or not. However, it's crucial to note that sitting out may not be a financially advantageous move for him. With a potential loss of 10 million dollars, he may find it challenging to recover that amount in future negotiations. Furthermore, it appears that team owners may be colluding to devalue his position, making this decision even more complicated.

On the other hand, Barkley is more likely to play, as he embodies a team-first attitude. He understands the importance of his presence on the field and recognizes the impact his absence could have on his teammates. While it's uncertain if his contributions will be adequately acknowledged, Barkley is willing to put the team's needs above his personal aspirations.

Both players find themselves in a precarious position since the deadline for a deal has already passed. This leaves them with two options: either play or abstain and face the consequences. Sacrificing potential earnings of $500,000 per game at the end of the season is a significant risk for both athletes. Additionally, it's worth mentioning that both teams have the option to franchise tag these players, setting the stage for a similar negotiation scenario in the future.

Considering the circumstances, it seems probable that Barkley will ultimately choose to play. The team-first mentality he embodies leads him to prioritize the needs of his teammates, even if his individual aspirations might be compromised. Furthermore, the team's depth at the running back position, as exemplified by the Raiders and their multiple running backs, may contribute to Barkley's decision.

Alternatively, if Jacobs decides to return and have a remarkable season, he might force the team to reconsider their valuation of him. However, it's crucial to recognize that the franchise tag salary is unlikely to increase exponentially. Both players have the power to affect negotiations by leveraging their absence and demonstrating their value through team success.

The decision to sit out or play is undoubtedly a challenging one for Jacobs and Barkley. While Jacobs may be inclined to prove a point, it's crucial to weigh the potential financial losses against the desired outcome. On the other hand, Barkley's team-first mentality could guide his choice to prioritize the collective goals of the team. Regardless of their decisions, both players play pivotal roles in their respective teams' success, making their choices influential factors in future negotiations.

Full video here: