James Sharman still has faith in Gareth Southgate!

International friendlies leading up to a major tournament are crucial moments for teams to fine-tune strategies and test player combinations. However, recent discussions have raised concerns about Gareth Southgate's approach to England's preparations.

One prominent issue highlighted is Southgate's tendency to deploy players out of their natural positions. This has sparked questions and criticisms, particularly regarding key talents like Jude Bellingham and Phil Foden, whose potential impact could be compromised by such tactical decisions.

The sentiment among England fans is mixed, reflecting a spectrum of emotions ranging from frustration to cautious optimism. While some express frustration over perceived mismanagement and concerns about squad cohesion, others remain loyal to Southgate, acknowledging his past achievements and the team's overall quality.

The absence of key players like Harry Kane and Bukayo Saka adds another layer of complexity to England's preparations. The reshaped attack without these influential figures raises uncertainties about the team's offensive prowess and tactical adaptability.

Despite the criticisms, there are positive notes regarding certain player performances. The inclusion of Mainoo and the partnership with Declan Rice have been viewed favourably, offering glimpses of potential solutions within the team structure.

The debate around Southgate's managerial style continues, with contrasting opinions on his pragmatism, aggression, and loyalty to established players. This dichotomy reflects the diverse perspectives within the fanbase, with some staunchly supporting Southgate's methods while others advocate for more innovative approaches.

As England navigates these challenges in the lead-up to the tournament, the spotlight remains on Southgate's ability to address tactical concerns, optimize player roles, and instill confidence in the team's capabilities.